Political Representation in Liquid Democracy
نویسندگان
چکیده
This article provides an in-depth survey of political representation in Liquid Democracy (LD). More precisely, it refutes two potential criticisms: 1) LD impoverishes the concept relative to existing representative democracies; 2) undermines centrality parties. In answer (1), shows that is compatible with a selection model representation, which proxies are characterized as gyroscopic representatives, driven by intrinsic motivation and indifferent sanctions. claim has far-reaching normative implications for mandate-independence tradeoff, anti-elitism, deliberation under LD. With regard (2), examines function parties, arguing that, although puts parties interest groups on level playing field, does not threaten partisanship, but rather expands range carriers partisanship. addressing these objections, this demonstrates democratic credentials LD, showing high-quality, understanding surrounded cluster thick concepts like commitment, motivation, alignment objectives, sympathy, trust, dialogue. turns into powerful instrument refurbishment both unique mode participation practice self-government.
منابع مشابه
Electoral Democracy and Political Representation in the European Union
This paper addresses two particular aspects of the much debated democratic deficit in EU governance – the capacity of parties at the European level to represent the will of the citizens of Europe, and the absence of a system of party government at the European level, whereby parties in the parliament lack the capacity to effectively control the governing bodies of the EU. We first evaluate the ...
متن کاملPolitical Parties and Democracy
A central claim of democratic theory is that democracy induces governments to be responsive to the preferences of the people. Political parties organize politics in every modern democracy, and some observers claim that parties are what induce democracies to be responsive. Yet, according to others, parties give voice to extremists and reduce the responsiveness of governments to the citizenry. Th...
متن کاملPolitical Legitimacy and Democracy
The stability and functioning of any kind of political regime—including democratic or representative ones—relies on the combination of the capacity of rulers and government officials to use coercion and the development of political legitimacy. Political legitimacy can be described as people's recognition and acceptance of the validity of the rules of their entire political system and the decisi...
متن کاملDemocracy and political boundaries
If democracy implies political equality, in the sense that everyone has roughly the same opportunity to influence political decisions, we may ask: ”Who are included among ‘everyone’?” In other words, if ”democracy” is government “by the people”, who are included among “the people”? This may be called ”the boundary problem in democratic theory”. The problem is not what actually existing peoples ...
متن کاملPolitical blogs and representative democracy
Representative democracy faces profound problems. Electoral turnout has declined to such an extent that the legitimacy of the mandate to govern is drawn into question [19,p. 33]. This problem is exacerbated and reinforced by a feeling of disconnection and distrust between the governed and the governors and a perception that voting and other forms of participation do not influence electoral outc...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Frontiers in political science
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['2673-3145']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.591853